The Philosopher's Stone According to Carl Jung
In the field of stone medicine, you may encounter the idea that Carl Jung described the philosopher's stone as an archetype of the self. This idea circulates widely, and I've seen it in classes, workshops, social media posts, and even product descriptions, lending stonework an intellectual foundation by invoking Jung's authority.
While Jung's work certainly deserves to be present in the stone medicine conversation, it's important to me, as a Jungian scholar and stone medicine practitioner, to correct this misrepresentation of his work. Jung never stated that the stone is itself an archetype. Rather, he identified the stone as a symbol of the archetype of the self, similar to the mandala. Before proceeding, it's important to distinguish between an archetype and a symbol, not only to correct the record, but also so that you have the correct information when moving forward with your own learning.
In Mysterium Coniunctionis (volume 14 of his Collected Works), in a later section called "The Self and the Bounds of Knowledge (par. 776)," Jung writes, "As I have repeatedly pointed out, the alchemist's statements about the lapis, considered psychologically, describe the archetype of the self." Lapis is simply the Latin word for stone, and the alchemists used lapis philosophorum, the philosopher's stone, as the name for the goal of the entire work, also known as The Great Work.
Jung chose his words carefully here, saying that the alchemists' statements about the lapis describe the archetype, which means the philosopher's stone itself is not the archetype. Instead, the archetype becomes perceptible through interpretations and descriptions of the philosopher's stone.
The Difference Between an Archetype and a Symbol of One
According to Jung, an archetype is a formal pattern within the psyche that has no content of its own. He is explicit about this in Aion (volume 9), part 1, in his essay on the mother archetype, where he writes that the archetype is empty and purely formal, a facultas praeformandi, or a capacity to give shape. In other words, an archetype is the shaping potential, not the shape itself.
You can think of archetypes as primordial possibilities that have existed since the moment the universe flared forth into existence. For example, the mother archetype can appear in countless forms, from the nurturing mother to the destructive one, and every variation in between. Archetypes arise from the primordial substratum Jung called the unus mundus, a concept he encountered through his study of alchemy. I will return to this idea shortly.
A symbol is what emerges when an archetype or an archetypal constellation takes form and becomes perceptible to us. Examples of this include a mandala, stone, dream figure, or story passed down through generations. Symbols are the visible forms we encounter, while the archetype is the underlying pattern that gives rise to them.
With this understanding, it is clear that an object cannot be an archetype, including the philosopher's stone. A concrete, tangible object contains content and components, while an archetype, as Jung defines it, is unformed and unmanifested potential.
Jung's Thoughts on the Lapis
In my research across the Collected Works, Jung's consistency in his view of the philosopher's stone became increasingly clear. In Aion (volume 9, part 2, par. 194), Jung writes that "the filius philosophorum (or macrocosmi), otherwise the lapis, means nothing other than the self." Later in the same volume, paragraph 426 he writes that the Rebis, or Lapis Philosophorum, "is so distinctively marked in the literature that we have no difficulty in recognizing it as a symbol of the self." In The Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious (volume 9, part 1, par. 246), in his essay "Concerning Rebirth," he writes that "from the nigredo issues the Stone, the symbol of the immortal self." Nigredo is the blackening, the first stage of the alchemical work, where materials putrefy and decompose, which is necessary for transformation to happen and for something new to take form.
Another term that underlies Jung's discussion of the philosopher's stone is unus mundus, which I introduced earlier. This foundational concept informed Jung's later psychological theories and also matters for my own doctoral research. Unus munus is Latin for 'one world' and is a concept Jung adopted from Gerhard Dorn, a sixteenth-century alchemist. Dorn described God as first creating one world, then dividing it into two: heaven and earth. For Jung, unus mundus refers to the single underlying reality from which both psyche and matter arise, before any division between inner and outer worlds takes place.
Jung is careful with his words around this concept as well, describing the unus mundus as a metaphysical speculation, in contrast to the unconscious, which we can experience indirectly through its manifestations. In Mysterium Coniunctionis (volume 14), he writes that the mandala is the empirical equivalent of the metaphysical concept of unus mundus, and that the alchemical equivalent is the lapis and its synonyms. The philosopher's stone, then, is the symbol the alchemists used to point toward that underlying unity, which is why it holds such significance in Jung's interpretation of their work.
Jung occasionally uses broader language when talking about the mandala. In Psychology and Alchemy, he refers to a definite archetype, the mandala, and in Aion, he mentions an a priori archetype, the mandala (a priori simply means it can be known through reasoning alone without needing empirical evidence; for example, you know an unmarried man is a bachelor; it's a given, so you don't need to meet every bachelor to know this to be true). He does not use this same terminology for the philosopher's stone, however. The mandala is called an archetype, and the philosopher's stone is a symbol, just as a tangible, physical stone is a symbol of the self.
A little later in Psychology and Alchemy, Jung revises his language around the mandala, noting that if the mandala motif is an archetype, it should be a collective phenomenon. In The Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious (volume 9, part 1), he defines the archetype as empty and purely formal and does not mention the mandala or the philosopher's stone at all. But even so, we must remember that the philosopher's stone is not subordinate to the mandala; rather, the mandala is sometimes described in vaguer terms, leaving the reader to draw their own conclusions about what Jung meant.
In my experience, understanding the philosopher's stone as a symbol rather than an archetype is more useful for practice for two reasons. First, it places the relationship in its proper place. If the philosopher's stone were the archetype itself, then working with stones would simply mean being near the right object, and the object would be responsible for transformation. When we view the philosopher's stone as a symbol of the self, the work of transformation (individuation) happens in the dynamic between you and the stone, in the act of recognition. This reflects what happens in practice and matches what I have observed in my own work with stones.
The second reason is that this distinction explains why the same stone does not have the same effect for everyone. An archetype has no content in and of itself, and therefore it has no fixed instance or standard form it always takes. Jung uses the analogy of a crystal's axial system, which shapes the stone's structure but does not determine its size or the exact form it will grow into. In this view, the pattern is consistent, but each expression of that pattern is unique. This is why stones selected for an individual based on their unique energetic constitution work better than stones chosen only for their basic qualities, without knowing whether those qualities would benefit the individual.
My Path to Jung and Stones
I had always been interested in stones, and as a child, I would gather them from around the lake next to my house. The shimmer of quartz in the stones I found made me feel like I had discovered a special treasure to cherish. Years later, I returned to stones from a metaphysical perspective and soon realized that the key to understanding their vibrational nature required a scientific approach, but this was exactly the thing that was missing from every book I read and every training on psychospiritual work with stones that I took. This frustration led me to become both a professional gemologist and a vibrational researcher, while I was also neck-deep in Jungian psychology, cosmology, philosophy, and consciousness studies for my Ph.D.
However, I came to Jung's work decades ago, during my first attempt at college at age 19. I planned to major in psychology, and my first undergrad class was in Freudian psychology. The following semester I took courses in philosophy, and the way I thought about everything changed. Philosophy, along with my interest in psychology and the occult, initially led me to Jung's work. Now, decades later, I'm a Ph.D. Jungian scholar, gemologist, vibrational scientist, jewelry designer, and stone medicine researcher, merging all the pursuits of my soul so that the universe may learn more about itself through my conscious human experience.
When I started my doctoral research a few years ago, while also engaging my other passion for working with stones, I began noticing all the instances of Jung talking about stones, or variations of it (lapis, crystal, stone, etc.). I was also studying alchemy and the Western esoteric traditions alongside Jung, so I was familiar with the concept of the philosopher's stone. As I followed the thread, my full understanding of stones and crystals, their role in advancing human consciousness, literally since the Stone Age with stone tools, expanded rapidly. I saw, from a psychological perspective based on the work of a pioneer in psychology on whom I was basing my own doctoral theory, that the symbology of the stone, and all its variations, was far deeper and more profound than I had consciously thought. Though I do believe that I was drawn to work with stones for this very reason - they are symbols of the self, thereby acting as literal doorways to the deep self, just like the mandala is if you meditate on one. Stones and crystals are mirrors reflecting our psychological projections back to us so that we may bring the shadow into the light, and experience integration as individuation in another step towards wholeness.
An interesting side note that I'll write another separate article about is that I have an identical twin sister, and we each found our way to a symbol of the self independently but at the same time - my sister began painting detailed mandalas while I began working with stones. At the time, neither of us understood the synchronicity, the deeper meaning for each of us, or what it says about human evolution and the development of individual and collective consciousness. As a philosopher and scholar, I ask these questions when synchronistic events like this manifest in my life. But this is a story for another time because it requires a good deal of unpacking and distillation of complex concepts. For now, I'll leave you with an invitation below this beautiful image of The Birth of the Philosopher's Stone.
A Talismanic Stone Medicine Invitation
I offer a service called Talismanic Stone Medicine, which is a private experience for someone going through a challenging archetypal phase in life - think midlife, children all grown and leaving home, a successful-on-paper business that pays the bills but debilitates the soul, career confusion, relationship issues, and more. This Jungian-led stone medicine package is a private three-session engagement with 90 days of support and mentorship afterward, and includes a custom necklace to be worn and worked with as a talisman, detailed instructions for its use, a custom guided binaural beat meditation to use with the piece, a custom vibrational elixir to take while doing the work, a talisman dossier, and a personal energetic assessment and astrological analysis (as a diagnostic only, not a reading) to understand your most activated archetypal phase. You can read the full description here, or email me directly with any questions: ashley@psycheandstone.com
Comments